Marzoog BA, Kopylov P. Myocardiocyte senescence in ischemic heart disease and breathome changes. World J Exp Med 2026; 16(1): 117186 [PMID: 41883446 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v16.i1.117186]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The journal demonstrates a clear ambition to become one of the most well-established and reputable publications in the medical field. Throughout the submission and review process, the editorial team maintained a high level of professionalism, efficiency, and transparency. Communication was timely and constructive, and the reviewers provided thoughtful and valuable feedback that significantly improved the quality of my manuscript. Overall, my experience with the journal reflects its strong commitment to academic excellence and integrity.
Reply from the Editorial Office
Thanks for taking the time to share this feedback with us. We would love to work with you again!